Academic Integrity Violation Process Decision flowchart showing reporting, preliminary review, two parallel processes joined by And (instructor decides course and grade consequences, and Student Conduct Officer creates a confidential file), responsibility determinations, hearing and sanctions. Follow the interactive decision guide on the website for a sequential text alternative. Underlined policy references open linked documents in new tabs. G start->review review->likely likely->minor No likely->instructor Yes minor->minor_record minor_record->end_minor instructor->meeting file->meeting meeting->responsible responsible->no_record No responsible->accept Yes no_record->end_no accept->accepted Yes accept->denied No accepted->accepted_file accepted_file->end_accept denied->hearing hearing->hearing_responsible hearing_responsible->no_record_hearing No hearing_responsible->sanctions Yes no_record_hearing->end_hearing_no sanctions->sanctions_file sanctions_file->end_sanctions start Instructor suspects an academic integrity violation and contacts Student Conduct Officer (SCO; Prof. Caitlin Jorgensen). review SCO counsels instructor re: policies, procedures, and likely sanctions; suggests that the instructor meet with the student; explains reporting process. likely Is Academic Integrity Violation likely? minor Incident is very minor, with no grade implications, and instructor chooses to handle it on their own. minor_record No file kept by SCO (although email records are kept). end_minor End And: both processes occur in parallel And instructor Definitions and GuidelinesInstructor decides consequences for Definitions and Guidelinescourse and grade based on severity, Definitions and Guidelinessyllabus policies, and “Definitions and Definitions and GuidelinesGuidelines” document. file Student Conduct Officer creates confidential file with materials from instructor: • Syllabus • Assignment sheet • Work in question • Copy of the original source • Evidence of violation • Email correspondence meeting Student Conduct Officer meets with student • explains Academic Integrity process • treats process as an educational moment • adjudicates charge and explains penalties Definitions and Guidelines  based on “Definitions and Guidelines” and Sanctions and Further Impact  “Sanctions and Further Impact” documents. • bases decision on “the preponderance of  evidence” (not “beyond reasonable doubt”) responsible Is the student found responsible for the violation? no_record File is kept by SCO for reference, but student has no conduct record. end_no End accept Does the student accept responsibility? accepted Student accepts responsibility for violation and the subsequent sanctions. accepted_file Sanctions and Other ImpactStudent file is kept in confidence in Sanctions and Other Impactaccordance with “Sanctions and Other Sanctions and Other ImpactImpact” document. end_accept End denied Student denies responsibility for violation and requests a hearing with an Administrative Hearing Board. hearing AHB is convened and determines responsibility based on the preponderance of evidence provided by instructor and student. hearing_responsible Is the student found responsible for the violation? no_record_hearing File is kept by SCO for reference, but student has no conduct record. end_hearing_no End sanctions Sanctions are assessed according to Sanctions and Other Impact“Sanctions and Other Impact” document, along with other sanctions determined by AHB. sanctions_file Sanctions and Other ImpactStudent file is kept in confidence in Sanctions and Other Impactaccordance with “Sanctions and Other Sanctions and Other ImpactImpact” document. end_sanctions End